On Friday, the Supreme Court delivered a sweeping broadside against the First Amendment of the Constitution just days ahead of the coming to power of President-elect Donald Trump, who has pledged to rule as "dictator on day one.

This ruling will disappoint the app’s 170 million users in the United States. But it reflects eminently reasonable deference to the judgment of Congress.

"It’s a strong stand for the First Amendment and against arbitrary censorship. We will work with President Trump on a long-term solution that keeps TikTok in the United States." Trump made his promise to TikTok on his own social media platform ...

Today, no law means whatever the court says it means. That happened last week when the Supreme Court upheld congressional legislation silencing TikTok.

Even as the Supreme Court upheld Congress' mandate that TikTok's Chinese owner sell the platform or shut it down, the First Amendment still guarantees the

Paul said he was disappointed, adding, "I do believe that banning a social media app like TikTok is a violation of the First Amendment."

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld on Friday a law banning TikTok in the United States on national ... did not violate the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment protection against government abridgment ...

"I want to thank President Trump for his commitment to work with us to find a solution that keeps TikTok available in the United States. This is a strong stand for the First Amendment and against ...

The Bill of Rights is not a vehicle for America’s foreign adversaries to undermine Americans’ freedoms. The Supreme Court recognized

With just days left in office, President Biden has said the Equal Rights Amendment is now the law of the land.

TikTok says it's “in the process” of restoring service to users in the United States after the popular video-sharing ... TikTok and ByteDance sued on First Amendment grounds, and the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously upheld the statute on Friday.

Doesn’t the Constitution mean what it says? Doesn’t no law mean no law? Regrettably, today, no law means whatever the court says it means.